Skip to main content
    Silloria
    BrandsNotesPerfumers
    Log inSign up

    Side by side

    LR Classics Singapore vs. 212 Men

    Very similar
    212 Men by Carolina Herrera bottle

    212 Men

    Carolina Herrera
    Eau de Toilette1999
    New comparison

    212 Men rates higher with the community and wears longer on skin, while LR Classics Singapore projects louder.

    The essentials

    At a glance

    Key facts: LR Classics Singapore vs. 212 Men
    LR Classics Singapore212 Men
    ConcentrationEau de ToiletteEau de Toilette
    Launched19901999
    GenderMaleMale
    Perfumer—Alberto Morillas
    Best seasonSpringSummer

    Scent DNA

    Main accords

    LR Classics Singapore

    Amber
    Balsamic
    Citrus
    Woody
    Cinnamon
    Lavender
    Warm Spicy
    Fresh Spicy

    212 Men

    Citrus
    Green
    Woody
    Fresh Spicy
    Aromatic
    Warm Spicy
    Powdery
    Musky

    Shared between both fragrances

    The pyramid

    Notes, side by side

    Top
    CinnamonOrangeLemon
    Green NotesGrapefruitBergamotSpicesPetitgrainLavender
    Heart
    LavenderSandalwoodJasmine
    GingerVioletGardeniaSage
    Base
    Peru BalsamResinous NotesMusk
    SandalwoodMuskVetiverIncenseGuaiac WoodLabdanum

    Notes both fragrances share

    Community taste

    The community verdict

    Community verdict: LR Classics Singapore vs. 212 Men
    LR Classics Singapore212 Men
    Score2.5/54/5
    Longevity2-4 hours6-10 hours
    Sillagestrongmoderate

    No varnish

    Real talk

    Bold warmth. Sweetness that doesn't ask permission. If subtlety is your thing, keep scrolling. But if you want a fragrance that commits, this 1990 oriental still has teeth and knows how to use them.LR Classics Singapore
    212 Men is a well-crafted citrus aromatic that refuses to stay one-dimensional once it settles. The drydown is where veteran wearers find their favorite phase, and it arrives reliably.212 Men