LR Classics Hawaii
LREau de Toilette1989
Side by side
LR Classics Hawaii vs. Gloria
Gloria rates higher with the community and wears longer on skin, while LR Classics Hawaii projects louder.
The essentials
At a glance
| LR Classics Hawaii | Gloria | |
|---|---|---|
| Concentration | Eau de Toilette | Eau de Toilette |
| Launched | 1989 | 2002 |
| Gender | Female | Female |
| Perfumer | — | Olivier Cresp |
| Best season | Fall | Winter |
Scent DNA
Main accords
LR Classics Hawaii
Vanilla
Warm Spicy
Powdery
Cinnamon
Woody
Sweet
Citrus
Gloria
Almond
Fruity
Vanilla
Sweet
Amber
Cherry
Nutty
Floral
Shared between both fragrances
The pyramid
Notes, side by side
Top
BergamotCloveCinnamon
AmarettoHibiscusRose
Heart
HeliotropeJasmineSandalwood
VanillaAmberWhite PepperWhite Flowers
Base
Tonka BeanVanillaMusk
CherryAlmondTonka BeanStyraxCedar
Notes both fragrances share
Community taste
The community verdict
| LR Classics Hawaii | Gloria | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 3.5/5 | 4/5 |
| Longevity | 4-6 hours | 6-10 hours |
| Sillage | strong | moderate |
No varnish
Real talk
The powdery aldehydic quality either pulls you into a warm 1989 nostalgia or makes you reach for something sharper. This is the fragrance for someone who wants vanilla that feels familiar.LR Classics Hawaii
Sweet enough to make an impression, warm enough to feel like a second skin. The amaretto-cherry axis is the real draw here, love it or find it too much, there's no middle ground.Gloria