
Fleur de Corail
Lolita LempickaEau de Parfum2008
Side by side


Fleur de Corail rates higher with the community and wears longer on skin, while Charlie White Musk projects louder.
This match is computed by our similarity model. The score weighs each fragrance's notes, accords, mood, occasion, weather fit, gender, and performance — the same scale as the badges on every “reminds of” rail.
The essentials
| Fleur de Corail | Charlie White Musk | |
|---|---|---|
| Concentration | Eau de Parfum | Eau de Toilette |
| Launched | 2008 | 1997 |
| Gender | Female | Female |
| Perfumer | Maurice Roucel | Steven Claisse |
| Best season | Summer | Fall |
Scent DNA
Fleur de Corail
Charlie White Musk
Shared between both fragrances
The pyramid
Notes both fragrances share
Community taste
| Fleur de Corail | Charlie White Musk | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 4/5 | 3.5/5 |
| Longevity | 6-10 hours | 4-6 hours |
| Sillage | moderate | strong |
No varnish
Frangipani is a creamy, tropical note that some find polarizing. Fleur de Corail handles it with precision, bright citrus keeps things airy, the amber and driftwood ground it without adding weight.Fleur de Corail
Melon, peach, and white musk do quiet work in this fragrance. It's a solid choice for daily wear, especially for those drawn to a clean aesthetic. The scent offers subtle.Charlie White Musk
Good to know