Into the Blue
GivenchyEau de Toilette2002
Side by side
Into the Blue vs. Parco Palladiano V: Lauro
Parco Palladiano V: Lauro rates higher with the community and wears longer on skin.
The essentials
At a glance
| Into the Blue | Parco Palladiano V: Lauro | |
|---|---|---|
| Concentration | Eau de Toilette | Eau de Parfum |
| Launched | 2002 | 2016 |
| Gender | Unisex | Unisex |
| Perfumer | Mark Buxton, Emilie Bevierre-Coppermann | Daniela Andrier |
| Best season | Summer | — |
Scent DNA
Main accords
Into the Blue
Green
Floral
Aromatic
Woody
Citrus
Sweet
Parco Palladiano V: Lauro
Fresh Spicy
Aromatic
Woody
Herbal
Camphor
Green
Shared between both fragrances
The pyramid
Notes, side by side
Top
DeadnettleSaint Germain Pear
MintLabdanum
Heart
Sweet PeaWhite Orchid
Bay LeafSageRosemaryBlack PepperTeaGeranium
Base
Sandalwood
Vetiver
Notes both fragrances share
Community taste
The community verdict
| Into the Blue | Parco Palladiano V: Lauro | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 3.5/5 | 4/5 |
| Longevity | 4-6 hours | 6-10 hours |
| Sillage | moderate | moderate |
No varnish
Real talk
Into the Blue doesn't chase trends. It was built in 2002 for a specific kind of wearer, someone who wants aquatic freshness without the usual chlorine-and-surf act.Into the Blue
The herbal heart on this one is what sets it apart, not a summer freshie, not a heavy hitter. It's built for the kind of person who reaches for complexity over compliment count.Parco Palladiano V: Lauro