Eaudemoiselle Rose a la Folie
GivenchyEau de Toilette2016
Side by side
Eaudemoiselle Rose a la Folie vs. Mamluk
Mamluk rates higher with the community and wears longer on skin.
The essentials
At a glance
| Eaudemoiselle Rose a la Folie | Mamluk | |
|---|---|---|
| Concentration | Eau de Toilette | Extrait de Parfum |
| Launched | 2016 | 2012 |
| Gender | Female | Unisex |
| Perfumer | Nicolas Bonneville | Chris Maurice |
| Best season | Spring | Fall |
Scent DNA
Main accords
Eaudemoiselle Rose a la Folie
Sweet
Gourmand
Rose
Fruity
Musky
Floral
Powdery
Mamluk
Honey
Sweet
Floral
Oud
Amber
Caramel
Powdery
Vanilla
Shared between both fragrances
The pyramid
Notes, side by side
Top
Candy Apple
HoneyCaramelBergamot
Heart
Tea Rose
JasmineSiam BenzoinOsmanthus
Base
Musk
AmberBourbon VanillaOud
Notes both fragrances share
Community taste
The community verdict
| Eaudemoiselle Rose a la Folie | Mamluk | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 3.5/5 | 4/5 |
| Longevity | 4-6 hours | 6-10 hours |
| Sillage | moderate | strong |
No varnish
Real talk
Some roses are for special occasions. This one is for Thursday. That flash of candy apple up top reads as fun, not immature, the tea rose keeps it from becoming perfume-counter obvious.Eaudemoiselle Rose a la Folie
If you've been burned by oud that smelled like a barn, this is the one that makes you reconsider. It is a gentle, golden warmth, not a challenging animalic growl.Mamluk
The hunt
Best price, size by size
| Eaudemoiselle Rose a la Folie | Mamluk | |
|---|---|---|
| 3.4 oz | $88.19fragrancenet | — |
Cheapest in-stock offer per size. Retailer links support Silloria at no extra cost to you.