Skip to main content
    Silloria
    BrandsNotesPerfumers
    Log inSign up

    Side by side

    So Delicious Women vs. Fantasme

    Very similar
    Fantasme by Ted Lapidus bottle

    Fantasme

    Ted Lapidus
    Eau de Toilette1992
    New comparison

    So Delicious Women rates higher with the community.

    The essentials

    At a glance

    Key facts: So Delicious Women vs. Fantasme
    So Delicious WomenFantasme
    ConcentrationEau de ParfumEau de Toilette
    Launched19931992
    GenderFemaleFemale
    PerfumerGale HaymanPierre Bourdon
    Best seasonFallWinter

    Scent DNA

    Main accords

    So Delicious Women

    Woody
    Rose
    Citrus
    White Floral
    Floral
    Powdery
    Warm Spicy

    Fantasme

    Fruity
    Powdery
    Sweet
    Woody
    Violet
    Rose
    Vanilla
    Musky

    Shared between both fragrances

    The pyramid

    Notes, side by side

    Top
    Mandarin Orange
    PeachPineappleVioletBergamotGreen Notes
    Heart
    RoseJasmine
    RoseOrris RootRaspberryJasmineLily of the Valley
    Base
    Sandalwood
    VanillaMuskCedarSandalwood

    Notes both fragrances share

    Community taste

    The community verdict

    Community verdict: So Delicious Women vs. Fantasme
    So Delicious WomenFantasme
    Score4/53.5/5
    Longevity6-10 hours6-10 hours
    Sillagemoderatemoderate

    No varnish

    Real talk

    Rose and sandalwood is a classic pairing, but So Delicious Women adds warmth that leans smoky, almost animalic. It's not polite. The kind of fragrance that makes someone lean in rather than pull away.So Delicious Women
    This is 90s femininity at full volume. Sweet, theatrical, unapologetic. Fantasme was designed to make an impression, to announce itself with confidence and stay with you.Fantasme