Skip to main content

    Side by side

    Magnetic vs. 273 Rodeo Drive

    Magnetic by Gabriela Sabatini bottle

    Magnetic

    Gabriela Sabatini
    Eau de Parfum1992
    Strikingly similar
    New comparison

    273 Rodeo Drive projects louder.

    The essentials

    At a glance

    Key facts: Magnetic vs. 273 Rodeo Drive
    Magnetic273 Rodeo Drive
    ConcentrationEau de ParfumEau de Parfum
    Launched19921989
    GenderFemaleFemale
    Best seasonFallFall

    Scent DNA

    Main accords

    Magnetic

    White Floral
    Floral
    Green
    Woody
    Powdery
    Tuberose
    Sweet
    Musky

    273 Rodeo Drive

    White Floral
    Fruity
    Woody
    Tuberose
    Sweet
    Powdery
    Animalic
    Yellow Floral

    Shared between both fragrances

    The pyramid

    Notes, side by side

    Top
    Mandarin OrangeWhite Hyacinth
    TuberoseGardeniaPeachPlumJasmine
    Heart
    GardeniaTuberoseYlang-YlangJasmineLily of the Valley
    ApricotYlang-YlangOrris Root
    Base
    MuskSandalwoodVanilla
    AmberSpicy NotesSandalwoodVetiverCedar

    Notes both fragrances share

    Community taste

    The community verdict

    Community verdict: Magnetic vs. 273 Rodeo Drive
    Magnetic273 Rodeo Drive
    Score4/54/5
    Longevity6-10 hours6-10 hours
    Sillagemoderatestrong

    No varnish

    Real talk

    The opening is fruity, floral, and clean. Then the gardenia and tuberose take over and it becomes something else entirely. That's the moment people either fall in or out.Magnetic
    Tuberose is a commitment. Either you're the person who walks in and the room recalibrates, or you're not ready for that kind of attention. This is the latter done with intention, fruity cream, powder.273 Rodeo Drive