
Pour L'Homme III
Emanuel UngaroEau de Toilette1993
Side by side


Pour L'Homme III rates higher with the community and wears longer on skin, while Michael Bublé Pour Homme projects louder.
This match is a verified relationship from our fragrance graph. The score weighs each fragrance's notes, accords, mood, occasion, weather fit, gender, and performance — the same scale as the badges on every “reminds of” rail.
The essentials
| Pour L'Homme III | Michael Bublé Pour Homme | |
|---|---|---|
| Concentration | Eau de Toilette | Eau de Parfum |
| Launched | 1993 | 2018 |
| Gender | Male | Male |
| Perfumer | Jacques Polge, François Demachy | Richard Ibanez |
| Best season | Winter | Spring |
Scent DNA
Pour L'Homme III
Michael Bublé Pour Homme
Shared between both fragrances
The pyramid
Notes both fragrances share
Community taste
| Pour L'Homme III | Michael Bublé Pour Homme | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 4/5 | 3.5/5 |
| Longevity | 6-10 hours | 4-6 hours |
| Sillage | moderate | strong |
No varnish
The vodka-rose combo either sounds wrong or sounds exactly right. There's no middle ground, and honestly, the people who wrinkle their nose haven't tried it on skin.Pour L'Homme III
There's a version of confident that shouts, and a version that simply shows up. This is the second kind. The citrus opens like you're already somewhere good.Michael Bublé Pour Homme
Good to know