Skip to main content

    Side by side

    Echo vs. 1775 Classic For Men

    Echo by Davidoff bottle

    Echo

    Davidoff
    Eau de Toilette2003
    Very similar
    New comparison

    1775 Classic For Men rates higher with the community, while Echo wears longer on skin.

    The essentials

    At a glance

    Key facts: Echo vs. 1775 Classic For Men
    Echo1775 Classic For Men
    ConcentrationEau de ToiletteEau de Toilette
    Launched20032014
    GenderMaleMale
    PerfumerAlain Astori, Pierre Wargnye, Béatrice Piquet
    Best seasonSpringSummer

    Scent DNA

    Main accords

    Echo

    Fresh Spicy
    Woody
    Warm Spicy
    Musky
    Powdery
    Leather

    1775 Classic For Men

    Aromatic
    Fresh Spicy
    Woody
    Musky
    Amber
    Citrus
    Lavender
    Herbal

    Shared between both fragrances

    The pyramid

    Notes, side by side

    Top
    AldehydesWater Notes
    LimeBergamotMandarin Orange
    Heart
    NutmegBlack PepperChili Pepper
    LavenderRosemarySage
    Base
    CedarMuskSandalwoodWhite Suede
    AmberMuskCypress

    Notes both fragrances share

    Community taste

    The community verdict

    Community verdict: Echo vs. 1775 Classic For Men
    Echo1775 Classic For Men
    Score3/53.5/5
    Longevity4-6 hours2-4 hours
    Sillagemoderatestrong

    No varnish

    Real talk

    Davidoff built Echo as the daytime counterpart to Cool Water. The suede note is the real story here, it keeps the aquatic nature from feeling generic. Solid for work but the drydown becomes intimate.Echo
    A well-mannered fragrance. Nothing shouts. Nothing shocks. The citrus opens crisp, the herbs arrive on time, and the drydown earns its keep. If you want a scent that knows when to leave the room.1775 Classic For Men