Skip to main content

    Side by side

    Brilliant Wish vs. Flowing

    Clearly related
    Flowing by Puma bottle

    Flowing

    Puma
    Eau de Toilette2003
    New comparison

    Brilliant Wish rates higher with the community and wears longer on skin.

    The essentials

    At a glance

    Key facts: Brilliant Wish vs. Flowing
    Brilliant WishFlowing
    ConcentrationEau de ToiletteEau de Toilette
    Launched20102003
    GenderFemaleFemale
    PerfumerLouise Turner, Michel Girard
    Best seasonFallSpring

    Scent DNA

    Main accords

    Brilliant Wish

    Amber
    Woody
    White Floral
    Musky
    Soft Spicy
    Fruity
    Sweet
    Powdery

    Flowing

    Powdery
    Violet
    Fruity
    Floral
    Sweet
    Woody
    Iris
    Yellow Floral

    Shared between both fragrances

    The pyramid

    Notes, side by side

    Top
    Pink PepperRed BerriesFruity Notes
    RaspberryFreesiaMandarin OrangeBlackcurrant
    Heart
    Star JasmineViolet Leaf
    VioletIrisMimosaYlang-Ylang
    Base
    AmberWoody NotesMusk
    VanillaSandalwoodMuskAmber

    Notes both fragrances share

    Community taste

    The community verdict

    Community verdict: Brilliant Wish vs. Flowing
    Brilliant WishFlowing
    Score3.5/53/5
    Longevity6-10 hours4-6 hours
    Sillagemoderatemoderate

    No varnish

    Real talk

    This is for the woman who doesn't need to fill the room. The sillage is moderate, close, intimate, a secret between two people. If you want to be smelled from across the street.Brilliant Wish
    Puma Flowing leans into its powdery iris heart like it means it. That's the move here, and the fragrance knows it. Fruity-sweet at the opening, warm and close by the drydown.Flowing

    The hunt

    Best price, size by size

    Best price by size: Brilliant Wish vs. Flowing
    Brilliant WishFlowing
    2.5 oz$24.49fragrancenet
    Best offer$41.98ecosmetics

    Cheapest in-stock offer per size. Retailer links support Silloria at no extra cost to you.