
Chic For Men
Carolina HerreraEau de Toilette2003
Side by side
Chic For Men rates higher with the community and wears longer on skin, while Dark Wash projects louder.
This match is a verified relationship from our fragrance graph. The score weighs each fragrance's notes, accords, mood, occasion, weather fit, gender, and performance — the same scale as the badges on every “reminds of” rail.
The essentials
| Chic For Men | Dark Wash | |
|---|---|---|
| Concentration | Eau de Toilette | Eau de Toilette |
| Launched | 2003 | 2021 |
| Gender | Male | Male |
| Perfumer | Carlos Benaïm | — |
| Best season | Spring | Fall |
Scent DNA
Chic For Men
Dark Wash
Shared between both fragrances
The pyramid
Notes both fragrances share
Where they fit
Community taste
| Chic For Men | Dark Wash | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 4/5 | 3/5 |
| Longevity | 6-10 hours | 2-4 hours |
| Sillage | moderate | strong |
No varnish
Chic For Men does something unusual by opening with watermelon, and it actually works. The citrus keeps it from feeling gimmicky, while the spiced drydown saves it from being another freshie.Chic For Men
Some fragrances shout. This one leans in and speaks at normal volume. The sesame opening is unexpectedly warm, the aquatic heart stays cool, and the sandalwood finish is soft.Dark Wash
Keep comparing
Good to know