212 Sexy
Carolina HerreraEau de Parfum2004
Side by side
212 Sexy vs. Bling Bling
Two distinct takes on a related mood. The side by side below shows where they overlap and where they part ways.
The essentials
At a glance
| 212 Sexy | Bling Bling | |
|---|---|---|
| Concentration | Eau de Parfum | Eau de Toilette |
| Launched | 2004 | 2010 |
| Gender | Female | Female |
| Perfumer | Alberto Morillas, Rosendo Mateu | — |
| Best season | Fall | Fall |
Scent DNA
Main accords
212 Sexy
Sweet
Powdery
Musky
Caramel
Vanilla
Soft Spicy
Floral
Citrus
Bling Bling
Citrus
White Floral
Powdery
Woody
Rose
Fresh
Floral
Musky
Shared between both fragrances
The pyramid
Notes, side by side
Top
Pink PepperBergamotMandarin Orange
BergamotBlackcurrantOrange
Heart
GardeniaFloral Notes
JasmineRoseLily of the Valley
Base
Cotton CandyVanillaWhite MuskSandalwood
AmberMuskSandalwoodVanilla
Notes both fragrances share
Community taste
The community verdict
| 212 Sexy | Bling Bling | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 3.5/5 | 3.5/5 |
| Longevity | 6-10 hours | 6-10 hours |
| Sillage | moderate | moderate |
No varnish
Real talk
Sweet enough to register. Warm enough to linger. What saves 212 Sexy from being another vanilla bomb is the gardenia, it keeps things lifted, almost fresh, even as the cotton candy settles in.212 Sexy
Here's the thing about Bling Bling: it's not pretending to be anything other than what it is, a confident, warm floral that knows how to wear itself well. The powdery drydown is its quiet flex.Bling Bling
The hunt
Best price, size by size
| 212 Sexy | Bling Bling | |
|---|---|---|
| 0.27 oz | $14.69fragrancenet | — |
| 2 oz | $57.95fragranceshop | — |
| 3.4 oz | $53.95fragranceshop | — |
Cheapest in-stock offer per size. Retailer links support Silloria at no extra cost to you.