Skip to main content

    Side by side

    212 Men vs. Emporio Armani Diamonds for Men

    212 Men by Carolina Herrera bottle

    212 Men

    Carolina Herrera
    Eau de Toilette1999
    Clearly related
    New comparison

    212 Men rates higher with the community and wears longer on skin.

    The essentials

    At a glance

    Key facts: 212 Men vs. Emporio Armani Diamonds for Men
    212 MenEmporio Armani Diamonds for Men
    ConcentrationEau de ToiletteEau de Toilette
    Launched19992008
    GenderMaleMale
    PerfumerAlberto MorillasJacques Cavallier Belletrud
    Best seasonSummer

    Scent DNA

    Main accords

    212 Men

    Citrus
    Green
    Woody
    Fresh Spicy
    Aromatic
    Warm Spicy
    Powdery
    Musky

    Emporio Armani Diamonds for Men

    Fresh
    Woody
    Sweet
    Spicy
    Synthetic

    Shared between both fragrances

    The pyramid

    Notes, side by side

    Top
    Green NotesGrapefruitBergamotSpicesPetitgrainLavender
    BergamotLemonSichuan Pepper
    Heart
    GingerVioletGardeniaSage
    CacaoCedar
    Base
    SandalwoodMuskVetiverIncenseGuaiac WoodLabdanum
    Guaiac WoodAmbroxanVetiver

    Notes both fragrances share

    Community taste

    The community verdict

    Community verdict: 212 Men vs. Emporio Armani Diamonds for Men
    212 MenEmporio Armani Diamonds for Men
    Score4/53.5/5
    Longevity6-10 hours4-6 hours
    Sillagemoderatemoderate

    No varnish

    Real talk

    212 Men is a well-crafted citrus aromatic that refuses to stay one-dimensional once it settles. The drydown is where veteran wearers find their favorite phase, and it arrives reliably.212 Men
    Here's the thing about this one: it's appealing without being sweet. That's harder than it sounds. Most fragrances in this category fall into predictable territory, generic and forgettable.Emporio Armani Diamonds for Men