Skip to main content

    Side by side

    Noa vs. Ruby Touch

    Noa by Cacharel bottle

    Noa

    Cacharel
    Eau de Toilette1998
    Moderately similar
    New comparison

    Noa rates higher with the community and wears longer on skin, while Ruby Touch projects louder.

    The essentials

    At a glance

    Key facts: Noa vs. Ruby Touch
    NoaRuby Touch
    ConcentrationEau de ToiletteEau de Parfum
    Launched19982025
    GenderFemaleUnisex
    PerfumerOlivier Cresp
    Best seasonSpringWinter

    Scent DNA

    Main accords

    Noa

    Floral
    Musky
    White Floral
    Powdery
    Fresh
    Green
    Woody
    Vanilla

    Ruby Touch

    Warm Spicy
    Metallic
    Leather
    Powdery
    Musky
    Tobacco
    Earthy

    Shared between both fragrances

    The pyramid

    Notes, side by side

    Top
    White MuskPeonyFreesiaGreen NotesPeachPlum
    Dried FruitsOrange
    Heart
    Lily of the ValleyGreen GrassJasmineYlang-YlangRose
    SaffronJasmineViolet
    Base
    CoffeeVanillaSandalwoodCorianderIncenseTonka BeanCedar
    MuskOakmossAmber

    Notes both fragrances share

    Community taste

    The community verdict

    Community verdict: Noa vs. Ruby Touch
    NoaRuby Touch
    Score4/53.5/5
    Longevity6-10 hours2-4 hours
    Sillagemoderatestrong

    No varnish

    Real talk

    Some fragrances announce themselves. Noa doesn't need to. The coffee note gives it warmth where others go linear, and that powdery finish keeps drawing you back. Weightless, yes.Noa
    Warm enough to wear in the cold months when you want scent that projects without trying. The saffron keeps it from being another sweet oriental, it's spicy first, floral second.Ruby Touch

    The hunt

    Best price, size by size

    Best price by size: Noa vs. Ruby Touch
    NoaRuby Touch
    1 oz$17.95fragranceshop
    1.7 oz$22.95fragranceshop
    3.4 oz$23.95fragranceshop

    Cheapest in-stock offer per size. Retailer links support Silloria at no extra cost to you.