Gloria
CacharelEau de Toilette2002
Side by side
Gloria vs. LR Classics Hawaii
Gloria rates higher with the community and wears longer on skin, while LR Classics Hawaii projects louder.
The essentials
At a glance
| Gloria | LR Classics Hawaii | |
|---|---|---|
| Concentration | Eau de Toilette | Eau de Toilette |
| Launched | 2002 | 1989 |
| Gender | Female | Female |
| Perfumer | Olivier Cresp | — |
| Best season | Winter | Fall |
Scent DNA
Main accords
Gloria
Almond
Fruity
Vanilla
Sweet
Amber
Cherry
Nutty
Floral
LR Classics Hawaii
Vanilla
Warm Spicy
Powdery
Cinnamon
Woody
Sweet
Citrus
Shared between both fragrances
The pyramid
Notes, side by side
Top
AmarettoHibiscusRose
BergamotCloveCinnamon
Heart
VanillaAmberWhite PepperWhite Flowers
HeliotropeJasmineSandalwood
Base
CherryAlmondTonka BeanStyraxCedar
Tonka BeanVanillaMusk
Notes both fragrances share
Community taste
The community verdict
| Gloria | LR Classics Hawaii | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 4/5 | 3.5/5 |
| Longevity | 6-10 hours | 4-6 hours |
| Sillage | moderate | strong |
No varnish
Real talk
Sweet enough to make an impression, warm enough to feel like a second skin. The amaretto-cherry axis is the real draw here, love it or find it too much, there's no middle ground.Gloria
The powdery aldehydic quality either pulls you into a warm 1989 nostalgia or makes you reach for something sharper. This is the fragrance for someone who wants vanilla that feels familiar.LR Classics Hawaii