
London for Men
BurberryEau de Toilette2006
Side by side


London for Men rates higher with the community and wears longer on skin.
This match is a verified relationship from our fragrance graph. The score weighs each fragrance's notes, accords, mood, occasion, weather fit, gender, and performance — the same scale as the badges on every “reminds of” rail.
The essentials
| London for Men | Perry Ellis (2018) | |
|---|---|---|
| Concentration | Eau de Toilette | Eau de Toilette |
| Launched | 2006 | 2017 |
| Gender | Male | Male |
| Perfumer | Antoine Maisondieu | — |
| Best season | Winter | Spring |
Scent DNA
London for Men
Perry Ellis (2018)
Shared between both fragrances
The pyramid
Notes both fragrances share
Where they fit
Community taste
| London for Men | Perry Ellis (2018) | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 4/5 | 3.5/5 |
| Longevity | 6-10 hours | 4-6 hours |
| Sillage | moderate | moderate |
No varnish
London for Men doesn't try to be revolutionary. It delivers what it promises: a structured, masculine composition with genuine depth. The leather-mimosa heart surprises, and the drydown rewards.London for Men
Perry Ellis nails the effortless brief. Classic fougere structure, lavender, oakmoss, herbs, but fresh enough for year-round wear. Nothing experimental, just confident execution.Perry Ellis (2018)
Keep comparing
Good to know