London for Men
BurberryEau de Toilette2006
Side by side
London for Men vs. Tonka Oud
London for Men rates higher with the community and wears longer on skin, while Tonka Oud projects louder.
The essentials
At a glance
| London for Men | Tonka Oud | |
|---|---|---|
| Concentration | Eau de Toilette | Eau de Parfum |
| Launched | 2006 | 2016 |
| Gender | Male | Unisex |
| Perfumer | Antoine Maisondieu | — |
| Best season | Winter | Fall |
Scent DNA
Main accords
London for Men
Tobacco
Cinnamon
Sweet
Warm Spicy
Woody
Leather
Lavender
Mossy
Tonka Oud
Rose
Woody
Animalic
Warm Spicy
Aromatic
Soft Spicy
Fresh Spicy
Floral
Shared between both fragrances
The pyramid
Notes, side by side
Top
CinnamonLavenderBergamot
RoseGeranium
Heart
LeatherMimosa
Russian valerian rootPatchouliVetiver
Base
Tobacco LeafGuaiac WoodOakmossMyrrh
OudTonka Bean
Notes both fragrances share
Community taste
The community verdict
| London for Men | Tonka Oud | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 4/5 | 3.5/5 |
| Longevity | 6-10 hours | 2-4 hours |
| Sillage | moderate | strong |
No varnish
Real talk
London for Men doesn't try to be revolutionary. It delivers what it promises: a structured, masculine composition with genuine depth. The leather-mimosa heart surprises, and the drydown rewards.London for Men
The tonka makes the oud approachable. The oud makes the tonka interesting. Together, they tell a story about what happens when sweetness doesn't have to apologize for itself.Tonka Oud