
London for Men
BurberryEau de Toilette2006
Side by side
London for Men rates higher with the community and wears longer on skin, while Mon Immortelle projects louder.
This match is a verified relationship from our fragrance graph. The score weighs each fragrance's notes, accords, mood, occasion, weather fit, gender, and performance — the same scale as the badges on every “reminds of” rail.
The essentials
| London for Men | Mon Immortelle | |
|---|---|---|
| Concentration | Eau de Toilette | — |
| Launched | 2006 | 2017 |
| Gender | Male | Unisex |
| Perfumer | Antoine Maisondieu | Carine Certain Boin |
| Best season | Winter | Fall |
Scent DNA
London for Men
Mon Immortelle
Shared between both fragrances
The pyramid
Notes both fragrances share
Community taste
| London for Men | Mon Immortelle | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 4/5 | 3/5 |
| Longevity | 6-10 hours | 2-4 hours |
| Sillage | moderate | strong |
No varnish
London for Men doesn't try to be revolutionary. It delivers what it promises: a structured, masculine composition with genuine depth. The leather-mimosa heart surprises, and the drydown rewards.London for Men
Immortelle is one of those ingredients most people have never smelled, which is exactly the point. Honeyed, herbal, slightly curry-warm. Not quite floral, not quite spice.Mon Immortelle
Good to know