Burberry Women
BurberryEau de Parfum1995
Side by side
Burberry Women vs. Saint (2017)
Burberry Women rates higher with the community and wears longer on skin.
The essentials
At a glance
| Burberry Women | Saint (2017) | |
|---|---|---|
| Concentration | Eau de Parfum | Eau de Parfum |
| Launched | 1995 | 2017 |
| Gender | Female | Female |
| Perfumer | Michel Almairac | — |
| Best season | — | Spring |
Scent DNA
Main accords
Burberry Women
Fruity
Powdery
Woody
Vanilla
Sweet
Musky
Saint (2017)
Fruity
Sweet
White Floral
Vanilla
Floral
Powdery
Musky
Fresh
Shared between both fragrances
The pyramid
Notes, side by side
Top
Green AppleBlackcurrant
Clary SagePlum
Heart
JasmineSandalwoodCedarwoodMoss
Almond BlossomLily of the Valley
Base
VanillaMusk
PeachMuskCedar
Notes both fragrances share
Community taste
The community verdict
| Burberry Women | Saint (2017) | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 4/5 | 3.5/5 |
| Longevity | 6-10 hours | 4-6 hours |
| Sillage | moderate | moderate |
No varnish
Real talk
Burberry Women is a case of well-executed restraint. The green apple and blackcurrant top is clean and modern, the woody heart keeps things grounded, and the vanilla drydown is subtle enough to wear.Burberry Women
The sweet-to-warm arc is the whole appeal here. White florals keep it from sliding into candy territory, and the base notes, peach, vanilla, cedar, give it depth without heaviness.Saint (2017)