New York for Ladies
Brooks BrothersEau de Parfum2008
Side by side
New York for Ladies vs. Pure Tiffany
New York for Ladies wears longer on skin, while Pure Tiffany projects louder.
The essentials
At a glance
| New York for Ladies | Pure Tiffany | |
|---|---|---|
| Concentration | Eau de Parfum | — |
| Launched | 2008 | 2003 |
| Gender | Female | Female |
| Perfumer | Ilias Ermenidis | Jacques Polge |
| Best season | Spring | Spring |
Scent DNA
Main accords
New York for Ladies
White Floral
Floral
Woody
Citrus
Green
Tuberose
Fresh Spicy
Sweet
Pure Tiffany
Floral
White Floral
Fresh
Aquatic
Citrus
Tuberose
Shared between both fragrances
The pyramid
Notes, side by side
Top
BergamotHyacinthFreesia
Bergamot
Heart
TuberoseOrange BlossomJasmineIrisOrris RootRosewood
Water LilyJasmineMagnoliaLilacTuberose
Base
MuskWoody Notes
Sandalwood
Notes both fragrances share
Community taste
The community verdict
| New York for Ladies | Pure Tiffany | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 3.5/5 | 3.5/5 |
| Longevity | 6-10 hours | 2-4 hours |
| Sillage | moderate | strong |
No varnish
Real talk
Clean enough to wear anywhere. White florals that don't shout. The kind of scent that gets remembered by the people who matter, close enough to notice, polite enough to let you leave the room first.New York for Ladies
Five white flowers in one bottle should overwhelm. It doesn't. Pure Tiffany keeps them arranged so neatly they feel effortless, like a jewelry setting that hides the engineering.Pure Tiffany