
Gingham Gorgeous
Bath & Body WorksEau de Parfum2023
Side by side


Gingham Gorgeous wears longer on skin, while Wild Sand projects louder.
This match is a verified relationship from our fragrance graph. The score weighs each fragrance's notes, accords, mood, occasion, weather fit, gender, and performance — the same scale as the badges on every “reminds of” rail.
The essentials
| Gingham Gorgeous | Wild Sand | |
|---|---|---|
| Concentration | Eau de Parfum | Eau de Parfum |
| Launched | 2023 | 2023 |
| Gender | Female | Female |
| Perfumer | Vincent Kuczinski | — |
| Best season | Spring | Summer |
Scent DNA
Gingham Gorgeous
Wild Sand
Shared between both fragrances
The pyramid
Notes both fragrances share
Where they fit
Community taste
| Gingham Gorgeous | Wild Sand | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 3.5/5 | 3.5/5 |
| Longevity | 6-10 hours | 2-4 hours |
| Sillage | moderate | strong |
No varnish
Gingham Gorgeous plays it straight with its heart notes, skipping the usual citrus or green topnotes. The strawberry-peach-peony combo lands squarely in sweet, girlish territory.Gingham Gorgeous
It's sweet, yes, but not in the way you'd expect. No strawberry, no vanilla overload. The cactus flower keeps things green and just-barely-tart, while the prickly pear adds a fruitiness that never.Wild Sand
Keep comparing
Gingham GorgeousvsBurberry Her80%
Gingham GorgeousvsKate Spade New York80%
Gingham GorgeousvsEden Juicy Apple | 01 Eau De Parfum80%
Gingham GorgeousvsBade'e Al Oud Sublime80%
Gingham GorgeousvsCloud Pink80%
Gingham GorgeousvsSweetest Song80%
Gingham GorgeousvsThank U Next 2.0 Body Mist80%
Gingham GorgeousvsCoach Floral Blush80%Good to know