
Musk for Men
AvonEau de Toilette1980
Side by side
Polo rates higher with the community and wears longer on skin.
This match is a verified relationship from our fragrance graph. The score weighs each fragrance's notes, accords, mood, occasion, weather fit, gender, and performance — the same scale as the badges on every “reminds of” rail.
The essentials
| Musk for Men | Polo | |
|---|---|---|
| Concentration | Eau de Toilette | Eau de Toilette |
| Launched | 1980 | 1978 |
| Gender | Male | Male |
| Perfumer | — | Carlos Benaïm |
| Best season | Fall | Fall |
Scent DNA
Musk for Men
Polo
Shared between both fragrances
The pyramid
Notes both fragrances share
Where they fit
Community taste
| Musk for Men | Polo | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 3/5 | 4/5 |
| Longevity | 4-6 hours | 6-10 hours |
| Sillage | moderate | strong |
No varnish
This is 80s masculinity in a bottle. Bold, animalic, and completely unapologetic. If you want polite, look elsewhere. If you want the real thing, you're in the right place.Musk for Men
Polo is not trying to impress anyone. This is a well-built masculine that knows exactly what it is, and has never needed to apologize for being a classic.Polo
The hunt
| Musk for Men | Polo | |
|---|---|---|
| 1.35 oz | — | $56.35ecosmetics |
| 2.5 oz | — | $60.67ecosmetics |
| 4 oz | — | $51.95fragranceshop |
| 6.7 oz | — | $93.39ecosmetics |
Cheapest in-stock offer per size. Retailer links support Silloria at no extra cost to you.
Keep comparing
Good to know