Skip to main content
    HousesNotesPerfumers

    Side by side

    Arrogance Pour Homme vs. Giorgio for Men

    Strikingly similar
    New comparison

    Giorgio for Men rates higher with the community and wears longer on skin.

    The essentials

    At a glance

    Key facts: Arrogance Pour Homme vs. Giorgio for Men
    Arrogance Pour HommeGiorgio for Men
    ConcentrationEau de ParfumEau de Toilette
    Launched19821984
    GenderMaleMale
    Best season—Fall

    Scent DNA

    Main accords

    Arrogance Pour Homme

    Woody
    Earthy
    Warm Spicy
    Amber
    Patchouli
    Mossy
    Animalic
    Leather

    Giorgio for Men

    Warm Spicy
    Woody
    Earthy
    Sweet
    Honey
    Amber
    Patchouli
    Floral

    Shared between both fragrances

    The pyramid

    Notes, side by side

    Top
    BergamotGreen NotesArtemisiaSpicy NotesLemon
    AldehydesOrangeBergamotFruity Notes
    Heart
    HoneyCarnationJasmineRoseCinnamonSandalwood
    PatchouliRoseCarnationCinnamonSandalwoodCedarwoodOrris Root
    Base
    PatchouliOakmossLabdanumCivetLeatherAmberVetiverCastoreumBenzoin
    HoneyOakmossAmberMuskVanillaBenzoinTonka Bean

    Notes both fragrances share

    Community taste

    The community verdict

    Community verdict: Arrogance Pour Homme vs. Giorgio for Men
    Arrogance Pour HommeGiorgio for Men
    Score3.5/54/5
    Longevity4-6 hours6-10 hours
    Sillagemoderatestrong

    No varnish

    Real talk

    This is a fragrance that speaks through its composition rather than argument. The warmth comes from a blend of leather, patchouli, and vetiver that settles into skin like something familiar.Arrogance Pour Homme
    Giorgio for Men does not whisper. It announces itself. The aldehydic lift over orange and allspice has an almost electric quality, while the patchouli-cinnamon heart brings unmistakable 80s power.Giorgio for Men