
Luna Park
AquolinaEau de Toilette2017
Side by side
Two distinct takes on a related mood. The side by side below shows where they overlap and where they part ways.
This match is a verified relationship from our fragrance graph. The score weighs each fragrance's notes, accords, mood, occasion, weather fit, gender, and performance — the same scale as the badges on every “reminds of” rail.
The essentials
| Luna Park | Curious | |
|---|---|---|
| Concentration | Eau de Toilette | Eau de Parfum |
| Launched | 2017 | 2004 |
| Gender | Female | Female |
| Perfumer | — | Claude Dir |
| Best season | Spring | Spring |
Scent DNA
Luna Park
Curious
Shared between both fragrances
The pyramid
Notes both fragrances share
Where they fit
Community taste
| Luna Park | Curious | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 3.5/5 | 3.5/5 |
| Longevity | 4-6 hours | 4-6 hours |
| Sillage | moderate | moderate |
No varnish
Luna Park leans hard into its marshmallow base, that's the call. If you're hunting for quiet refinement, look elsewhere. But if you want sweetness that actually smells edible rather than synthetic.Luna Park
Curious doesn't chase you down. It lets you decide if you want to be found. Clean without being sterile, feminine without being loud, and that vanilla base that stays close long after the top notes.Curious
The hunt
| Luna Park | Curious | |
|---|---|---|
| 3.3 oz | — | $27.50ecosmetics |
Cheapest in-stock offer per size. Retailer links support Silloria at no extra cost to you.
Keep comparing
Good to know